In February 2025, the European Commission introduced the 'Omnibus' proposal, aiming to simplify and reduce the administrative burden of EU sustainability reporting requirements. This initiative seeks to amend key legislative frameworks, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) , the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and the EU Taxonomy Regulation.

CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive)

The CSRD requires companies to disclose standardized, detailed information on their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. It increases corporate transparency and helps investors, consumers, and stakeholders evaluate sustainability performance.

CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive)

The CSDDD obliges companies to identify, prevent, and address adverse human rights and environmental impacts throughout their value chains. It establishes clear accountability for corporate supply chain practices.

EU Taxonomy Regulation

The EU Taxonomy is a science-based classification system that defines which economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. It guides investors toward truly green investments and helps prevent greenwashing.

Key Changes from CSRD to Omnibus

1. Adjusted Reporting Thresholds

The Omnibus proposal raises the employee threshold for mandatory CSRD reporting from 250 to 1,000 employees. This change would exempt approximately 80% of companies previously required to report, reducing the number from around 50,000 to 10,000.

2. Delayed Reporting Timelines

Companies newly in scope due to the CSRD's expansion will have their reporting obligations postponed by two years, providing additional time to adapt to the requirements.

3. Simplified Reporting Standards

The European Commission plans to streamline the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) by reducing the number of required data points and eliminating sector-specific standards.

4. Modifications to the EU Taxonomy Regulation

The proposal suggests limiting the full scope of the EU Taxonomy Regulation to the largest companies, specifically those falling under the CSDDD. Companies under the CSRD but not meeting CSDDD thresholds may opt-in voluntarily.

5. Changes to the CSDDD

The Omnibus proposal aims to reduce the sustainability due diligence burden on businesses by targeting due diligence primarily to direct business partners, removing certain civil liability clauses, and extending monitoring intervals from one to five years.

Diverging National Positions

Germany and France: Advocating for Deregulation

Germany and France have expressed concerns that stringent sustainability reporting requirements may hinder the competitiveness of European industries, especially in the face of global competition. Both nations have advocated for a complete repeal of certain supply chain laws, arguing that the extensive compliance requirements are unaffordable and impractical, particularly for smaller firms.

Denmark: Championing Sustainability

In contrast, Denmark has opposed calls to scrap the EU's proposed supply chain law. Danish Industry Minister Morten Bødskov emphasized the importance of the law, arguing for simplifications rather than abolishment. Denmark is pushing for ambitious climate legislation, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040.

Italy: Balancing Act

Italy has shown support for the Omnibus proposal to reduce administrative burdens but also stresses the need to maintain strong environmental standards.

Netherlands and Spain: Cautious Optimism

The Netherlands and Spain have welcomed efforts to reduce bureaucracy but emphasized that these changes must not come at the cost of sustainability ambitions.

Poland and Hungary: Economic Concerns

Poland and Hungary have expressed concerns that the proposed changes may disproportionately favor larger economies, leaving smaller member states at a competitive disadvantage.

Implications for Businesses

1. Navigating Regulatory Fragmentation

With varying degrees of implementation and harmonization across member states, businesses operating internationally must adapt to differing sustainability reporting obligations.

2. Maintaining Stakeholder Trust

Amid political divergence, companies should maintain robust sustainability practices to demonstrate long-term commitment to environmental and social goals.

3. Preparing for Future Regulatory Changes

Firms should remain agile and monitor legislative developments to ensure timely compliance and strategic alignment.

4. Leveraging Competitive Advantage

Sustainability leadership positions companies to attract investors and talent, meet global standards, and build reputation resilience.

5. Ensuring Supply Chain Resilience

Changes to due diligence frameworks necessitate renewed focus on value chain mapping and supplier engagement to maintain oversight.

Contact an expert

Ready to onboard your sustainability transformation?

Sustainability consulting

Propel your business towards net zero carbon and build on new, sustainable opportunities with ELEKS Sustainability Consulting; your one-stop-shop for sustainability consulting, implementation and scaling. View service

Energy

Adopt an advanced energy management software solution to dramatically improve the productivity, accessibility, safety and sustainability of your business power system. View industry